OKlibrary  0.2.1.6
ReductionBasedRepresentations.hpp File Reference

On investigations into boolean function representations with different inference properties. More...

Go to the source code of this file.


Detailed Description

On investigations into boolean function representations with different inference properties.

Todo:
Connections
Todo:
r-based clause-sets
  • Let r be a reduction and F be an active clause-set.
  • F is called "r-based" if for a partial assignment phi such that phi * F is unsatisfiable we have that r-reduction applied to F yields a contradiction.
  • Furthermore we speak of "properly r-based" if removal of a clause or removal of some literal-occurrence either creates a clause-set not equivalent to F or which is no longer r-based.
  • F is "r-based w.r.t. V" for some set V of variables, if F is r-based with respect to all partial assignments in V, and F is "totally r-based" if we can use V = var(F).
  • If nothing is said, then "totally" is always implied.
  • F is "strongly r-based" if F is r-based and for all partial assignments phi we have that the r(phi*F) has no forced assignments, that is, there is no variable v in var(F) and e in {0,1} such that <v -> e> * phi*F is unsatisfiable.
  • Natural examples for r are r = r_k (k a natural number >= 0).
  • The weaker r the stronger is the representation (w.r.t. inference power).
  • The property of being (totally) (properly) r-based implicitly compares F with the underlying boolean function; we can also speak of an r-based representation of a boolean function.
  • If F is a CNF-clause-set, then being r_0-based is equivalent to F containing all prime implicates of C, while being properly r_0-based is equivalent to being maximally prime (consisting exactly of the set of all prime-CNF-clauses).
  • See "The notion of a base of a clause-set relative to some reduction" in ComputerAlgebra/Satisfiability/Lisp/Reductions/plans/RBases.hpp for the case where no additional variables are considered:
    1. We make the natural assumption that if F' is a strengthening of F, i.e., adding clauses and/or shortening clauses, then {} in r(F) implies {} in r(F').
    2. That F (totally) properly r-based is now equivalent to F being an r-base of the set of prime-CNF-clauses of F.
  • The function rand_rbase_cs(F,r) in ComputerAlgebra/Satisfiability/Lisp/Reductions/RBases.mac randomly computes an r-base of F.
Todo:
Positive representations
  • Defining a positive representation
    1. Consider a boolean condition C on variables V (that is, C(f) is a boolean value for total assignments f, and C depends only on V).
    2. A "positive representation" R of C is an active clause-set on variables V' >= V such that if R(f) is true then also C(f) is true, and for f such that C(f) is true there is a unique f' which differs from f only on V' - V such that C'(f) is true.
    3. Perhaps this should better be called a "unique positive representation", while in general we demand only the existence of some f'. This is equivalently to saying that the projection of the satisfying assignments for R to V yield exactly the satisfying assignments for C.
  • r-based positive representations
    1. See "r-based representations" above.
    2. In general, if we say a positive representation R of a condition C is r-based, then R is r-based w.r.t. V (where V is the underlying set of original variables, while the representation uses V' >= V).
    3. If R is r-based with respect to V', then we make this explicit by calling R "totally r-based".
    4. Note that, in general, we do not consider the effect of assignments to variables in V' - V. It seems sensible to me (OK) to consider this as the basis, but for further refinements considerations of V' - V might be needed.
    5. Another sensible condition here is for satisfying f for C(f) how difficult it is to compute the extension f'. For example one could demand that the additional assignments follow by unit-clause propagation.

Definition in file ReductionBasedRepresentations.hpp.